....^«:$&§ §&$:«^....
...^«:$&§# #§&$:«^...
..^«:$&§## ##§&$:«^..
.^«:$&§### ###§&$:«^.
..^«:$&§## ##§&$:«^..
...^«:$&§# ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ #§&$:«^...
....^«:$&§ ^............^ §&$:«^....
.....^«:$& ^. .^ &$:«^.....
......^«:$ ^. feedback .^ $:«^......
.......^«: ^. .^ :«^.......
........^« ^............^ «^........
.........^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^.........
........^« «^........
.......^«: feedback is for making the process a :«^.......
......^«:$ whole lot more messy, to introduce a $:«^......
.....^«:$& fractal in the spice mix... things or &$:«^.....
....^«:$&§ populations of things start to be self §&$:«^....
...^«:$&§# referential or self eating #§&$:«^...
..^«:$&§## (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ##§&$:«^..
.^«:$&§### ###§&$:«^.
..^«:$&§## in the sixties they did research in the ##§&$:«^..
...^«:$&§# jungle and in the sea and they found #§&$:«^...
....^«:$&§ that feedback does not give rise to an §&$:«^....
.....^«:$& equilibrium. they were trying to prove &$:«^.....
......^«:$ that nature is a tame beast. but she's $:«^......
.......^«: not! :«^.......
........^« this may hold true out there... but «^........
.........^ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ^.........
........^« on your technique, you might easily «^........
.......^«: find recurrences. :«^.......
......^«:$ $:«^......
.....^«:$& &$:«^.....
....^«:$&§ §&$:«^....
...^«:$&§# #§&$:«^...
..^«:$&§## ##§&$:«^..
.^«:$&§### ###§&$:«^.