.......:~† †~:.......
......:~†$ $†~:......
.....:~†$¤ ¤$†~:.....
....:~†$¤£ £¤$†~:....
...:~†$¤£@ @£¤$†~:...
..:~†$¤£@# :::::::::::::: #@£¤$†~:..
.:~†$¤£@## :............: ##@£¤$†~:.
..:~†$¤£@# :. .: #@£¤$†~:..
...:~†$¤£@ :. feedback .: @£¤$†~:...
....:~†$¤£ :. .: £¤$†~:....
.....:~†$¤ :............: ¤$†~:.....
......:~†$ :::::::::::::: $†~:......
.......:~† †~:.......
........:~ feedback is for making the process a ~:........
.........: whole lot more messy, to introduce a :.........
.......... fractal in the spice mix... things or ..........
.......... populations of things start to be self ..........
.......... referential or self eating ..........
.........: (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... :.........
........:~ ~:........
.......:~† in the sixties they did research in the †~:.......
......:~†$ jungle and in the sea and they found $†~:......
.....:~†$¤ that feedback does not give rise to an ¤$†~:.....
....:~†$¤£ equilibrium. they were trying to prove £¤$†~:....
...:~†$¤£@ that nature is a tame beast. but she's @£¤$†~:...
..:~†$¤£@# not! #@£¤$†~:..
.:~†$¤£@## this may hold true out there... but ##@£¤$†~:.
..:~†$¤£@# maybe not in signal wizardry? depending #@£¤$†~:..
...:~†$¤£@ on your technique, you might easily @£¤$†~:...
....:~†$¤£ find recurrences. £¤$†~:....
.....:~†$¤ ¤$†~:.....
......:~†$ $†~:......
.......:~† †~:.......
........:~ ~:........
.........: :.........
.......... ..........