,~=:%£§@## ##@§£%:=~,
,,,,,,,=%§ §%=,,,,,,,
,~=:£§@### ###@§£:=~,
,,,,,,=%§@ @§%=,,,,,,
,,,=::%££§ §££%::=,,,
,,,,,=:£§@ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @§£:=,,,,,
,,~==%%£@# ~,,,,,,,,,,,,~ #@£%%==~,,
,~=:%£§§@# ~, ,~ #@§§£%:=~,
,~~~:%%%§@ ~, feedback ,~ @§%%%:~~~,
,~=:%£§@## ~, ,~ ##@§£%:=~,
,,,~~=%§§§ ~,,,,,,,,,,,,~ §§§%=~~,,,
,,,=:::%£§ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ §£%:::=,,,
,~=:%£§@## ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@## feedback is for making the process a ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£@### fractal in the spice mix... things or ###@£%:=~,
,,,~:%%£§@ populations of things start to be self @§£%%:~,,,
,,,,,,~:£§ referential or self eating §£:~,,,,,,
,~=:%£@### (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ###@£%:=~,
,~=::%££§§ §§££%::=~,
,~=:%£§@## in the sixties they did research in the ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@## jungle and in the sea and they found ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@@# that feedback does not give rise to an #@@§£%:=~,
,~=:::£££@ equilibrium. they were trying to prove @£££:::=~,
,~=:%£§@## that nature is a tame beast. but she's ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§§§@ not! @§§§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@## this may hold true out there... but ##@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§@@@ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending @@@§£%:=~,
,~=:%£§### on your technique, you might easily ###§£%:=~,
,~=:%££§@# find recurrences. #@§££%:=~,
,~~====:%§ §%:====~~,
,~=:%%££§# #§££%%:=~,
,~=:%§@### ###@§%:=~,
,~=:%£§@## ##@§£%:=~,
,,,,,~=%£§ §£%=~,,,,,
,~=::%£££§ §£££%::=~,