.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«««%%%%¶ ¶%%%%«««~.
..~~««%@@¶ ¶@@%««~~..
.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## ~............~ ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## ~. .~ ##¶@%%/«~.
....~«//%@ ~. feedback .~ @%//«~....
.~«/%%@¶## ~. .~ ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«////%@# ~............~ #@%////«~.
.......«%@ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @%«.......
.....~~/%@ @%/~~.....
.~«/%%@¶¶# feedback is for making the process a #¶¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## fractal in the spice mix... things or ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@@¶# populations of things start to be self #¶@@%%/«~.
......~/%@ referential or self eating @%/~......
.~«/%%@¶## (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## in the sixties they did research in the ##¶@%%/«~.
....«//%%@ jungle and in the sea and they found @%%//«....
.~«/%%%%%¶ that feedback does not give rise to an ¶%%%%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## equilibrium. they were trying to prove ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## that nature is a tame beast. but she's ##¶@%%/«~.
...~~«/%@# not! #@%/«~~...
.~«/%%%@@@ this may hold true out there... but @@@%%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶¶¶ on your technique, you might easily ¶¶¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@¶## find recurrences. ##¶@%%/«~.
.~«/%%@@@¶ ¶@@@%%/«~.
.~«««%%%@¶ ¶@%%%«««~.
.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
....««%%%@ @%%%««....
.~«/%%@¶## ##¶@%%/«~.
...~«%%@@¶ ¶@@%%«~...