.,«^§¤@¶## ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@### ###@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@### ###@¤§^«,.
.,«^§§¤@¶# #¶@¤§§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§§¤¤¤@ ,............, @¤¤¤§§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ,. ., ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ,. feedback ., ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ,. ., ##¶@¤§^«,.
....«^¤¤@¶ ,............, ¶@¤¤^«....
.,«^§¤@¶## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##¶@¤§^«,.
.....,^¤@# #@¤^,.....
.,«^§¤@¶## feedback is for making the process a ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§§§§@¶ fractal in the spice mix... things or ¶@§§§§^«,.
....,^^§¤¶ populations of things start to be self ¶¤§^^,....
.,«^§¤@¶## referential or self eating ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ##¶@¤§^«,.
....««§¤¤¶ ¶¤¤§««....
.,«^§¤@¶¶¶ in the sixties they did research in the ¶¶¶@¤§^«,.
....,«^¤@¶ jungle and in the sea and they found ¶@¤^«,....
......«^¤¶ that feedback does not give rise to an ¶¤^«......
.,«^§¤@¶## equilibrium. they were trying to prove ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## that nature is a tame beast. but she's ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## not! ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## this may hold true out there... but ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@### maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ###@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## on your technique, you might easily ##¶@¤§^«,.
.....«^^¤¶ find recurrences. ¶¤^^«.....
.,«^§¤@¶## ##¶@¤§^«,.
..,,^§¤@¶¶ ¶¶@¤§^,,..
.,«^§¤@¶## ##¶@¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤¤¤@¶ ¶@¤¤¤§^«,.
.,«^§¤@¶## ##¶@¤§^«,.
.....«««§@ @§«««.....