&¤¤¤¤*:»., ,.»:*¤¤¤¤&
&&**:::»., ,.»:::**&&
&&*».,,,,, ,,,,,.»*&&
#@#&¤*:»., ,.»:*¤&#@#
#@#&¤*:»., ,.»:*¤&#@#
&**:.,,,,, .............. ,,,,,.:**&
#@#&¤*:»., .,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,.»:*¤&#@#
###&¤*:»., ., ,. ,.»:*¤&###
&*:»»».,,, ., feedback ,. ,,,.»»»:*&
#@#&¤*:»., ., ,. ,.»:*¤&#@#
&*»,,,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,»*&
#¤¤***:»., .............. ,.»:***¤¤#
#@#&¤*:»., ,.»:*¤&#@#
&*»..,,,,, feedback is for making the process a ,,,,,..»*&
#@#&¤*:»., whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,.»:*¤&#@#
#@#&¤*:»., fractal in the spice mix... things or ,.»:*¤&#@#
#@#&¤*:»., populations of things start to be self ,.»:*¤&#@#
#&¤¤:»,,,, referential or self eating ,,,,»:¤¤&#
#@#&¤*:»., (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,.»:*¤&#@#
@#¤¤:.,,,, ,,,,.:¤¤#@
#@#&¤*:»., in the sixties they did research in the ,.»:*¤&#@#
&*»,,,,,,, jungle and in the sea and they found ,,,,,,,»*&
#@#&¤*:»., that feedback does not give rise to an ,.»:*¤&#@#
#@#&¤*:»., equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,.»:*¤&#@#
&¤¤:»,,,,, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,,,,,»:¤¤&
&¤¤¤**:»., not! ,.»:**¤¤¤&
#@#&¤*:»., this may hold true out there... but ,.»:*¤&#@#
&&¤:»,,,,, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,,,,,»:¤&&
##@&¤*:»., on your technique, you might easily ,.»:*¤&@##
&¤*:.,,,,, find recurrences. ,,,,,.:*¤&
#&**::..., ,...::**&#
&¤¤¤*:»»., ,.»»:*¤¤¤&
##@#¤*:»., ,.»:*¤#@##
#@#&¤*:»., ,.»:*¤&#@#
&¤***»,,,, ,,,,»***¤&
#@#&¤*:»., ,.»:*¤&#@#