,,«†$¤@### ###@¤$†«,,
,,«†§$¤¤¤@ @¤¤¤$§†«,,
,,,,,,««§¤ ¤§««,,,,,,
,,,,«†§$@@ @@$§†«,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,,,†§§¤@ ,, ,, @¤§§†,,,,,
,,«†§¤@### ,, feedback ,, ###@¤§†«,,
,,«†§§$¤¤@ ,, ,, @¤¤$§§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$$¤¤@ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, @¤¤$$§†«,,
,,,,«†††$@ @$†††«,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## feedback is for making the process a ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,,,,,«§¤ fractal in the spice mix... things or ¤§«,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,†§¤ populations of things start to be self ¤§†,,,,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## referential or self eating ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤¤¤@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... @¤¤¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## in the sixties they did research in the ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## jungle and in the sea and they found ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,««§§$@# that feedback does not give rise to an #@$§§««,,,
,,«†§$¤@## equilibrium. they were trying to prove ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤### that nature is a tame beast. but she's ###¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## not! ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,,,,«§$@ this may hold true out there... but @$§«,,,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,,«†§¤@@ on your technique, you might easily @@¤§†«,,,,
,,,,,«§§¤# find recurrences. #¤§§«,,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@@@ @@@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,
,,,,,†§¤@# #@¤§†,,,,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,
,,«†§$¤@## ##@¤$§†«,,