,-«/**§§§# #§§§**/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶¶¶ ¶¶¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«//**§#¶ -------------- ¶#§**//«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# -,,,,,,,,,,,,- #@¶#§*/«-,
,,,,,,-/§# -, ,- #§/-,,,,,,
,,,,,,-/*# -, feedback ,- #*/-,,,,,,
,,,,,,-/*# -, ,- #*/-,,,,,,
,,,««*§##¶ -,,,,,,,,,,,,- ¶##§*««,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# -------------- #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@@ feedback is for making the process a @@¶#§*/«-,
,-/*§#¶@## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##@¶#§*/-,
,,,,-«//*# fractal in the spice mix... things or #*//«-,,,,
,,,,,,««*# populations of things start to be self #*««,,,,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# referential or self eating #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶@# (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§¶@## ##@¶§*/«-,
,,--//§##¶ in the sixties they did research in the ¶##§//--,,
,,,,-//*§# jungle and in the sea and they found #§*//-,,,,
,,,,,,-/*# that feedback does not give rise to an #*/-,,,,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# equilibrium. they were trying to prove #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§§§#@ that nature is a tame beast. but she's @#§§§*/«-,
,,,,«**§¶@ not! @¶§**«,,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# this may hold true out there... but #@¶#§*/«-,
,-«/*§#¶## maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ##¶#§*/«-,
,,,,-«*§§¶ on your technique, you might easily ¶§§*«-,,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# find recurrences. #@¶#§*/«-,
,,,-«/§§§¶ ¶§§§/«-,,,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,,,,-«*§#@ @#§*«-,,,,
,,---/*##@ @##*/---,,
,-«/*§#¶@# #@¶#§*/«-,
,,,,,,-/*# #*/-,,,,,,