##@@£=†~-, ,-~†=£@@##
@@==~,,,,, ,,,,,~==@@
@£££†--,,, ,,,--†£££@
@@£==†~,,, ,,,~†==£@@
##@@£=†~-, ,-~†=£@@##
##@@£=†~-, -------------- ,-~†=£@@##
##@@£=†~-, -,,,,,,,,,,,,- ,-~†=£@@##
###@@£=†~- -, ,- -~†=£@@###
@@@=~-,,,, -, feedback ,- ,,,,-~=@@@
@=~-,,,,,, -, ,- ,,,,,,-~=@
@£†-,,,,,, -,,,,,,,,,,,,- ,,,,,,-†£@
#@==~~---, -------------- ,---~~==@#
#@@@£=†~-, ,-~†=£@@@#
##@@£=†~-, feedback is for making the process a ,-~†=£@@##
@£££==†~-, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,-~†==£££@
@@@££=†~-, fractal in the spice mix... things or ,-~†=££@@@
##@@£=†~-, populations of things start to be self ,-~†=£@@##
@£†--,,,,, referential or self eating ,,,,,--†£@
@=~~,,,,,, (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,,,,,,~~=@
##@@£=†~-, ,-~†=£@@##
@@@=†~-,,, in the sixties they did research in the ,,,-~†=@@@
###@£=†~-, jungle and in the sea and they found ,-~†=£@###
#@£££=†~-, that feedback does not give rise to an ,-~†=£££@#
@@£†~~~,,, equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,,,~~~†£@@
@=~~~,,,,, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,,,,,~~~=@
##@@£=†~-, not! ,-~†=£@@##
@£=†---,,, this may hold true out there... but ,,,---†=£@
##@@£=†~-, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,-~†=£@@##
@=††-,,,,, on your technique, you might easily ,,,,,-††=@
##@@£=†~-, find recurrences. ,-~†=£@@##
@@@££=†~-, ,-~†=££@@@
@@£†~-,,,, ,,,,-~†£@@
##@@£=†~-, ,-~†=£@@##
@@@£†~---, ,---~†£@@@
@@£=†---,, ,,---†=£@@
@@£††---,, ,,---††£@@