.,~^$&£@## ##@£&$^~,.
...,,^%$£@ @£$%^,,...
.,~^%$&£@# #@£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@@ @@£&$%^~,.
...~^%%&&& &&&%%^~...
......~^$& ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, &$^~......
.,~^%$&&&@ ,............, @&&&$%^~,.
......~%&& ,. ., &&%~......
.,~^%$&@## ,. feedback ., ##@&$%^~,.
.......~%& ,. ., &%~.......
.,~^%$&££@ ,............, @££&$%^~,.
......,~%& ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, &%~,......
.....~%&£@ @£&%~.....
.......~%& feedback is for making the process a &%~.......
.,~^%$&£@# whole lot more messy, to introduce a #@£&$%^~,.
.....,,^%& fractal in the spice mix... things or &%^,,.....
.,~^%$&£@# populations of things start to be self #@£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$$$&& referential or self eating &&$$$%^~,.
......,^$£ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... £$^,......
.,~^%$$&&& &&&$$%^~,.
.,~^%$$&&£ in the sixties they did research in the £&&$$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@# jungle and in the sea and they found #@£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@@ that feedback does not give rise to an @@£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&&£@ equilibrium. they were trying to prove @£&&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@# that nature is a tame beast. but she's #@£&$%^~,.
...~^^%%&@ not! @&%%^^~...
.,~^%$&£@# this may hold true out there... but #@£&$%^~,.
.,~^$&£@## maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ##@£&$^~,.
.,~^%$&££@ on your technique, you might easily @££&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£## find recurrences. ##£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@# #@£&$%^~,.
...,~^^$£@ @£$^^~,...
.,~^%$&£@# #@£&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&&&£ £&&&$%^~,.
.,~^%$&£@# #@£&$%^~,.
.,~%$&£@## ##@£&$%~,.