,,,,,,~^£& &£^~,,,,,,
,~~~~^**£& &£**^~~~~,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,,~~~*£&&# #&&£*~~~,,
,~~^*&#### ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ####&*^~~,
,,,~~^**&# ~,,,,,,,,,,,,~ #&**^~~,,,
,,,~^^*&&# ~, ,~ #&&*^^~,,,
,~~^*£&### ~, feedback ,~ ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*&#### ~, ,~ ####&*^~~,
,,,,,~^£## ~,,,,,,,,,,,,~ ##£^~,,,,,
,,,,~^^*&# ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #&*^^~,,,,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### feedback is for making the process a ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### whole lot more messy, to introduce a ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### fractal in the spice mix... things or ###&£*^~~,
,,~~~**£&& populations of things start to be self &&£**~~~,,
,,,,,,~**& referential or self eating &**~,,,,,,
,,,,~~^£&# (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... #&£^~~,,,,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£#### in the sixties they did research in the ####£*^~~,
,~~^*£#### jungle and in the sea and they found ####£*^~~,
,,~~~**£&& that feedback does not give rise to an &&£**~~~,,
,~~^*£#### equilibrium. they were trying to prove ####£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### that nature is a tame beast. but she's ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### not! ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### this may hold true out there... but ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### on your technique, you might easily ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### find recurrences. ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,,,,~~~^£# #£^~~~,,,,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,
,~~^***£&& &&£***^~~,
,~~^*£&### ###&£*^~~,