,,-*$£&&@# #@&&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,,,--$&&@ @&&$--,,,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,,,-***£@ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, @£***-,,,,
,,-*$£&&&# ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #&&&£$*-,,
,,,-*$$£&# ,, ,, #&£$$*-,,,
,,-*$£££@@ ,, feedback ,, @@£££$*-,,
,,-*$£&### ,, ,, ###&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&&&@ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, @&&&£$*-,,
,,-**$$$&& ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, &&$$$**-,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*£&@### feedback is for making the process a ###@&£*-,,
,,-*$£&@## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@@@ fractal in the spice mix... things or @@@&£$*-,,
,,,,,-$$&@ populations of things start to be self @&$$-,,,,,
,,,,,*$£@# referential or self eating #@£$*,,,,,
,,,,,-$£&@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... @&£$-,,,,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## in the sixties they did research in the ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$$£&@# jungle and in the sea and they found #@&£$$*-,,
,,,---*£&@ that feedback does not give rise to an @&£*---,,,
,,-*$£&@## equilibrium. they were trying to prove ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@@# that nature is a tame beast. but she's #@@&£$*-,,
,,,,,,-$£& not! &£$-,,,,,,
,,,,,,-*£@ this may hold true out there... but @£*-,,,,,,
,,-*$£&@## maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## on your technique, you might easily ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## find recurrences. ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,,,,**££@ @££**,,,,,
,,-*$£&@## ##@&£$*-,,
,,-*$£&### ###&£$*-,,
,,,,,,*$&& &&$*,,,,,,