@@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@@
@@&*^^^^.. ..^^^^*&@@
@@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@@
¤&&&$$*~^. .^~*$$&&&¤
#@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@#
¤$*^...... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ......^*$¤
#@@¤&$*~^. ^............^ .^~*$&¤@@#
@&&*~~^^.. ^. .^ ..^^~~*&&@
@@@¤&$*~^. ^. feedback .^ .^~*$&¤@@@
@@@¤&$*~^. ^. .^ .^~*$&¤@@@
#@@¤&$*~^. ^............^ .^~*$&¤@@#
¤$*^...... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ......^*$¤
¤$$*~^.... ....^~*$$¤
@&&&&$*~^. feedback is for making the process a .^~*$&&&&@
#@@¤&$*~^. whole lot more messy, to introduce a .^~*$&¤@@#
¤¤¤¤&$*~^. fractal in the spice mix... things or .^~*$&¤¤¤¤
@¤&*^..... populations of things start to be self .....^*&¤@
@@¤$~^^^.. referential or self eating ..^^^~$¤@@
#@@¤&$*~^. (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... .^~*$&¤@@#
@@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@@
@¤¤$**~~^. in the sixties they did research in the .^~~**$¤¤@
@¤¤$~^^... jungle and in the sea and they found ...^^~$¤¤@
#@@¤&$*~^. that feedback does not give rise to an .^~*$&¤@@#
¤$*~^..... equilibrium. they were trying to prove .....^~*$¤
¤¤¤¤&$*~^. that nature is a tame beast. but she's .^~*$&¤¤¤¤
¤$**^^.... not! ....^^**$¤
¤$~....... this may hold true out there... but .......~$¤
#@@¤&$*~^. maybe not in signal wizardry? depending .^~*$&¤@@#
@@¤&&$*~^. on your technique, you might easily .^~*$&&¤@@
@@@¤&$*~^. find recurrences. .^~*$&¤@@@
#@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@#
##@@¤$*~^. .^~*$¤@@##
¤¤&$~~^^^. .^^^~~$&¤¤
¤$*^^..... .....^^*$¤
@@&&*~.... ....~*&&@@
#@@¤&$*~^. .^~*$&¤@@#