.....:/@@# #@@/:.....
.:»///=@@@ @@@=///»:.
...:»»»=@@ @@=»»»:...
....:/=@@@ @@@=/:....
.:»/=@@@## ##@@@=/»:.
.:»/===@@@ :::::::::::::: @@@===/»:.
....:/@@@@ :............: @@@@/:....
.:»/=@@@## :. .: ##@@@=/»:.
....:»/=@@ :. feedback .: @@=/»:....
....::/=@# :. .: #@=/::....
.:»/=@@@## :............: ##@@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@@## :::::::::::::: ##@@@=/»:.
......»/@@ @@/»......
.....:»»=@ feedback is for making the process a @=»»:.....
.:»/==@@@# whole lot more messy, to introduce a #@@@==/»:.
......:/@@ fractal in the spice mix... things or @@/:......
....»/==@# populations of things start to be self #@==/»....
.:»/=@@@## referential or self eating ##@@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@### (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ###@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@@## ##@@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@@## in the sixties they did research in the ##@@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@@## jungle and in the sea and they found ##@@@=/»:.
...::/@@@@ that feedback does not give rise to an @@@@/::...
...»»»»/=@ equilibrium. they were trying to prove @=/»»»»...
.:»/=@@### that nature is a tame beast. but she's ###@@=/»:.
.:»/=@@@## not! ##@@@=/»:.
.:»»/===@@ this may hold true out there... but @@===/»»:.
....://=@@ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending @@=//:....
....:/=@@@ on your technique, you might easily @@@=/:....
.....»/==@ find recurrences. @==/».....
.....:/==@ @==/:.....
.:»=@@@### ###@@@=»:.
.....»»=@@ @@=»».....
.:»/=@@@## ##@@@=/»:.
...::/@@@# #@@@/::...
..:://@@@@ @@@@//::..