¶¶##£==»,, ,,»==£##¶¶
##¶#£==»,, ,,»==£#¶##
#£££===»,, ,,»===£££#
####£==»,, ,,»==£####
#£=,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,=£#
##¶#£==»,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,»==£#¶##
#¶¶#£==»,, ,, ,, ,,»==£#¶¶#
#=»,,,,,,, ,, feedback ,, ,,,,,,,»=#
##£==»»,,, ,, ,, ,,,»»==£##
##¶#£==»,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, feedback is for making the process a ,,»==£#¶##
¶#=====»,, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,,»=====#¶
¶¶##£==»,, fractal in the spice mix... things or ,,»==£##¶¶
###¶£==»,, populations of things start to be self ,,»==£¶###
##£££==»,, referential or self eating ,,»==£££##
¶#£££==»,, (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,,»==£££#¶
##¶#£==»,, ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, in the sixties they did research in the ,,»==£#¶##
¶#===,,,,, jungle and in the sea and they found ,,,,,===#¶
###¶#==»,, that feedback does not give rise to an ,,»==#¶###
##¶#£==»,, equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,,»==£#¶##
####£==»,, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,,»==£####
#¶££==,,,, not! ,,,,==££¶#
##¶#£==»,, this may hold true out there... but ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, on your technique, you might easily ,,»==£#¶##
##¶#£==»,, find recurrences. ,,»==£#¶##
###=»,,,,, ,,,,,»=###
##===»,,,, ,,,,»===##
#¶#===»,,, ,,,»===#¶#
##¶#£==»,, ,,»==£#¶##
¶££==,,,,, ,,,,,==££¶
###¶#£==,, ,,==£#¶###