,@,,@@@,@, @@@,,@@,,,
@@,@,,@@@@ ,,@,@,@,,,
,@@@,@,,,, ,@@@@@@,,@
@,,@@@,,,, @,,,,,@,@@
@,@,,@,,,, @,,,,@@@,,
@@@,@@,,,@ .............. @,,,@,,@,@
,,@@,@,,@, .,,,,,,,,,,,,. @,,@@,@@@,
,@,@@@,@@@ ., ,. @,@,@@,,@,
@@@,,@@,,@ ., feedback ,. @@@@,@,@@,
,,@,@,@,@, ., ,. ,,,@@@@,@@
,@@@@@@@@, .,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,@,,,@@,@
@,,,,,,,@@ .............. ,@@,,@,@@@
@,,,,,,@,@ @,@,@@@,,,
@,,,,,@@@, feedback is for making the process a @@@@,,@,,@
@,,,,@,,@, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,,,@,@@,@,
@,,,@@,@@, fractal in the spice mix... things or ,,@@@,@@@@
@,,@,@@,@, populations of things start to be self ,@,,@@,,,,
@,@@@,@@@, referential or self eating @@,@,@,,,@
@@,,@@,,@@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,@@@@@,,@,
,@,@,@,@,@ @,,,,@,@@@
@@@@@@@@@, in the sixties they did research in the @,,,@@@,,@
,,,,,,,,@, jungle and in the sea and they found @,,@,,@,@,
,,,,,,,@@, that feedback does not give rise to an @,@@,@@@@,
,,,,,,@,@@ equilibrium. they were trying to prove @@,@@,,,@,
,,,,,@@@,, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,@@,@,,@@,
,,,,@,,@,@ not! @,@@@,@,@,
,,,@@,@@@, this may hold true out there... but @@,,@@@@@,
,,@,@@,,@@ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,@,@,,,,@,
,@@@,@,@,@ on your technique, you might easily @@@@,,,@@,
@,,@@@@@@@ find recurrences. ,,,@,,@,@,
@,@,,,,,,@ ,,@@,@@@@@
@@@,,,,,@, ,@,@@,,,,,
,,@,,,,@@@ @@@,@,,,,@
,@@,,,@,,@ ,,@@@,,,@@
@,@,,@@,@, ,@,,@,,@,@
@@@,@,@@@, @@,@@,@@@,