¨¨¨¨«==££¶ ¶££==«¨¨¨¨
¨¨¨¨¨¨,=$& &$=,¨¨¨¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«««$$$&@ @&$$$«««,¨
¨,«=$£&¶## ##¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨¨¨««$£& ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, &£$««¨¨¨¨¨
¨¨¨,===$$& ,¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨, &$$===,¨¨¨
¨¨¨¨¨¨«$£¶ ,¨ ¨, ¶£$«¨¨¨¨¨¨
¨¨,,,=$££¶ ,¨ feedback ¨, ¶££$=,,,¨¨
¨¨¨¨,,«$$& ,¨ ¨, &$$«,,¨¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# ,¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨, #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨,««=$&& ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, &&$=««,¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# feedback is for making the process a #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# whole lot more messy, to introduce a #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨,=$$£&@ fractal in the spice mix... things or @&£$$=,¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# populations of things start to be self #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨««=$$£¶ referential or self eating ¶£$$=««¨¨¨
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨«$& (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... &$«¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@@ in the sixties they did research in the @@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# jungle and in the sea and they found #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# that feedback does not give rise to an #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨¨«==$&¶ equilibrium. they were trying to prove ¶&$==«¨¨¨¨
¨,«=$£&¶@@ that nature is a tame beast. but she's @@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# not! #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨¨¨¨«««$£¶ this may hold true out there... but ¶£$«««¨¨¨¨
¨,,«=$£££& maybe not in signal wizardry? depending &£££$=«,,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# on your technique, you might easily #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&&¶@ find recurrences. @¶&&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$£&¶¶@ @¶¶&£$=«,¨
¨«=$£&¶@## ##@¶&£$=«¨
¨,«=$£&¶@# #@¶&£$=«,¨
¨,«=$$$£&& &&£$$$=«,¨