#@£#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#£@#
##@#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#@##
##£#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#£##
@#&===/-,, ,,-/===&#@
##=/,,,,,, ,,,,,,/=##
##£#&=/-,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,-/=&#£##
#==/,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,/==#
#@£#&=/-,, ,, ,, ,,-/=&#£@#
@@£#&=/-,, ,, feedback ,, ,,-/=&#£@@
£###&=/-,, ,, ,, ,,-/=&###£
###===/-,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,-/===###
#@£#&=/-,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,-/=&#£@#
£###&=/-,, ,,-/=&###£
#==//,,,,, feedback is for making the process a ,,,,,//==#
@#=-,,,,,, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,,,,,,-=#@
#@£#&=/-,, fractal in the spice mix... things or ,,-/=&#£@#
#@£#&=/-,, populations of things start to be self ,,-/=&#£@#
#&=-,,,,,, referential or self eating ,,,,,,-=&#
£#&&/,,,,, (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,,,,,/&&#£
£&==/,,,,, ,,,,,/==&£
@@£#&=/-,, in the sixties they did research in the ,,-/=&#£@@
£#=/,,,,,, jungle and in the sea and they found ,,,,,,/=#£
££##&=/-,, that feedback does not give rise to an ,,-/=&##££
£#&&==/-,, equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,,-/==&&#£
@££#&=/-,, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,,-/=&#££@
£##&&=/-,, not! ,,-/=&&##£
#@£#&=/-,, this may hold true out there... but ,,-/=&#£@#
#@£#&=/-,, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,,-/=&#£@#
#@£#&=/-,, on your technique, you might easily ,,-/=&#£@#
##@#&=/-,, find recurrences. ,,-/=&#@##
#@£#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#£@#
##@#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#@##
##£#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#£##
@@£#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#£@@
##@#&=/-,, ,,-/=&#@##
##@£#&/-,, ,,-/&#£@##