£££==,,,,, ,,,,,==£££
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
¶£££$=†=^, ,^=†=$£££¶
#¶£==†^^^, ,^^^†==£¶#
###¶£=†=^, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ,^=†=£¶###
##¶£$=†=^, ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ ,^=†=$£¶##
##¶£$=†=^, ^, ,^ ,^=†=$£¶##
###£$=†=^, ^, feedback ,^ ,^=†=$£###
###¶£=†=^, ^, ,^ ,^=†=£¶###
###¶£$==^, ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ ,^==$£¶###
¶$$$==†=^, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ,^=†==$$$¶
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
#¶$==^,,,, feedback is for making the process a ,,,,^==$¶#
¶£=††^,,,, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,,,,^††=£¶
###¶£$=†=^ fractal in the spice mix... things or ^=†=$£¶###
##¶£$=†=^, populations of things start to be self ,^=†=$£¶##
##¶£$=†=^, referential or self eating ,^=†=$£¶##
££££$=†=^, (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,^=†=$££££
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
¶$=†^,,,,, in the sixties they did research in the ,,,,,^†=$¶
##¶£$=†=^, jungle and in the sea and they found ,^=†=$£¶##
¶£=†=,,,,, that feedback does not give rise to an ,,,,,=†=£¶
#££===†=^, equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,^=†===££#
##¶£$=†=^, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,^=†=$£¶##
#¶££$=†=^, not! ,^=†=$££¶#
££====†=^, this may hold true out there... but ,^=†====££
¶$$=†==,,, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,,,==†=$$¶
¶$===^^,,, on your technique, you might easily ,,,^^===$¶
£==††=,,,, find recurrences. ,,,,=††==£
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
#£$==^,,,, ,,,,^==$£#
¶¶¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶¶¶
#¶££$=†=^, ,^=†=$££¶#
##¶£$=†=^, ,^=†=$£¶##
¶¶$††^,,,, ,,,,^††$¶¶