,-=^**£££# #£££**^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,,,,,-^^£# #£^^-,,,,,
,--==^^^*£ £*^^^==--,
,,,,---^££ ££^---,,,,
,,,==*££## -------------- ##££*==,,,
,-=^*££### -,,,,,,,,,,,,- ###££*^=-,
,-=^*£££## -, ,- ##£££*^=-,
,-=^*££### -, feedback ,- ###££*^=-,
,-=^*£££## -, ,- ##£££*^=-,
,-=^*££### -,,,,,,,,,,,,- ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### -------------- ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### feedback is for making the process a ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### whole lot more messy, to introduce a ###££*^=-,
,,,,,-^*££ fractal in the spice mix... things or ££*^-,,,,,
,,,,,,=^££ populations of things start to be self ££^=,,,,,,
,-=^*££### referential or self eating ###££*^=-,
,,,,-^^^£# (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... #£^^^-,,,,
,-=^***££# #££***^=-,
,,,--^£££# in the sixties they did research in the #£££^--,,,
,,-===^££# jungle and in the sea and they found #££^===-,,
,-=^*££### that feedback does not give rise to an ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### equilibrium. they were trying to prove ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### that nature is a tame beast. but she's ###££*^=-,
,,,,,=^^*£ not! £*^^=,,,,,
,-=^*££### this may hold true out there... but ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ###££*^=-,
,,,,--=^*£ on your technique, you might easily £*^=--,,,,
,-=^*££### find recurrences. ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,
,-=^*££### ###££*^=-,