@§§§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§§§@
###§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§###
#@#§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§#@#
#@#§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§#@#
§*/^,,,,,, ,,,,,,^/*§
#@#§$*/«^, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ,^«/*$§#@#
#@#§$*/«^, ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ ,^«/*$§#@#
@§$*««^,,, ^, ,^ ,,,^««*$§@
#@#§$*/«^, ^, feedback ,^ ,^«/*$§#@#
#§$$/^,,,, ^, ,^ ,,,,^/$$§#
#@#§$*/«^, ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ ,^«/*$§#@#
#@#§$*/«^, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ,^«/*$§#@#
#@#§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§#@#
#$*/^^^,,, feedback is for making the process a ,,,^^^/*$#
#@#§$*/«^, whole lot more messy, to introduce a ,^«/*$§#@#
@§$*««,,,, fractal in the spice mix... things or ,,,,««*$§@
§$$///^,,, populations of things start to be self ,,,^///$$§
#$$/^^,,,, referential or self eating ,,,,^^/$$#
###§$*/«^, (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ,^«/*$§###
§§*/^,,,,, ,,,,,^/*§§
###§$*/«^, in the sixties they did research in the ,^«/*$§###
#$$/«,,,,, jungle and in the sea and they found ,,,,,«/$$#
§*«,,,,,,, that feedback does not give rise to an ,,,,,,,«*§
#$*««^,,,, equilibrium. they were trying to prove ,,,,^««*$#
##@§$*/«^, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,^«/*$§@##
###§$*/«^, not! ,^«/*$§###
@#$***/«^, this may hold true out there... but ,^«/***$#@
###§$*/«^, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ,^«/*$§###
#@#§$*/«^, on your technique, you might easily ,^«/*$§#@#
#$$//^^^,, find recurrences. ,,^^^//$$#
#@#§$*/«^, ,^«/*$§#@#
#§$$$*/«^, ,^«/*$$$§#
#$**/««^^, ,^^««/**$#
§§$/««,,,, ,,,,««/$§§
@§$//^,,,, ,,,,^//$§@
##§$*«^,,, ,,,^«*$§##