....:~*$£@ @£$*~:....
...:~*$£@@ @@£$*~:...
..:~*$£@@@ @@@£$*~:..
.:~*$£@@@# #@@@£$*~:.
..:~*$£@@@ @@@£$*~:..
...:~*$£@@ :::::::::::::: @@£$*~:...
....:~*$£@ :............: @£$*~:....
.....:~*$£ :. .: £$*~:.....
......:~*$ :. feedback .: $*~:......
.......:~* :. .: *~:.......
........:~ :............: ~:........
.......:~* :::::::::::::: *~:.......
......:~*$ $*~:......
.....:~*$£ feedback is for making the process a £$*~:.....
....:~*$£@ whole lot more messy, to introduce a @£$*~:....
...:~*$£@@ fractal in the spice mix... things or @@£$*~:...
..:~*$£@@@ populations of things start to be self @@@£$*~:..
.:~*$£@@@# referential or self eating #@@@£$*~:.
..:~*$£@@@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... @@@£$*~:..
...:~*$£@@ @@£$*~:...
....:~*$£@ in the sixties they did research in the @£$*~:....
.....:~*$£ jungle and in the sea and they found £$*~:.....
......:~*$ that feedback does not give rise to an $*~:......
.......:~* equilibrium. they were trying to prove *~:.......
........:~ that nature is a tame beast. but she's ~:........
.......:~* not! *~:.......
......:~*$ this may hold true out there... but $*~:......
.....:~*$£ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending £$*~:.....
....:~*$£@ on your technique, you might easily @£$*~:....
...:~*$£@@ find recurrences. @@£$*~:...
..:~*$£@@@ @@@£$*~:..
.:~*$£@@@# #@@@£$*~:.
..:~*$£@@@ @@@£$*~:..
...:~*$£@@ @@£$*~:...
....:~*$£@ @£$*~:....
.....:~*$£ £$*~:.....