¨,«*%$#### ####$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@@# #@@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨¨¨«*$# #$*«¨¨¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨¨,«*$# ,¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨, #$*«,¨¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## ,¨ ¨, ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨,*$#@@ ,¨ feedback ¨, @@#$*,¨¨¨¨
¨¨¨,««*%%# ,¨ ¨, #%%*««,¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@@@ ,¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨, @@@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨,,««*%# ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #%*««,,¨¨¨
¨¨¨¨,«%$#@ @#$%«,¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## feedback is for making the process a ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## whole lot more messy, to introduce a ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## fractal in the spice mix... things or ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨«*$$$@ populations of things start to be self @$$$*«¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## referential or self eating ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«**%%### in the sixties they did research in the ###%%**«,¨
¨,«*%$#### jungle and in the sea and they found ####$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## that feedback does not give rise to an ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨¨,«%## equilibrium. they were trying to prove ##%«,¨¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## that nature is a tame beast. but she's ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«%$#@### not! ###@#$%«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## this may hold true out there... but ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨,«***$$@ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending @$$***«,¨¨
¨¨¨,,«**%# on your technique, you might easily #%**«,,¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## find recurrences. ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨¨¨¨««%%## ##%%««¨¨¨¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨
¨,«**%%%$# #$%%%**«,¨
¨,«*%$#@## ##@#$%*«,¨