###@$==«.. ..«==$@###
###@$==«.. ..«==$@###
¤=««...... ......««=¤
@¤¤===.... ....===¤¤@
@$$====«.. ..«====$$@
##@¤$==«.. .............. ..«==$¤@##
##@¤$==«.. .............. ..«==$¤@##
###@$==«.. .. .. ..«==$@###
¤¤$=...... .. feedback .. ......=$¤¤
@¤==«..... .. .. .....«==¤@
##@¤$==«.. .............. ..«==$¤@##
##@¤$==«.. .............. ..«==$¤@##
¤¤====.... ....====¤¤
¤¤===«.... feedback is for making the process a ....«===¤¤
##@¤$==«.. whole lot more messy, to introduce a ..«==$¤@##
¤$$=...... fractal in the spice mix... things or ......=$$¤
#¤=«««««.. populations of things start to be self ..«««««=¤#
##@¤$==«.. referential or self eating ..«==$¤@##
@$$$===«.. (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... ..«===$$$@
¤$$=«..... .....«=$$¤
#¤¤$==.... in the sixties they did research in the ....==$¤¤#
@@@¤$==«.. jungle and in the sea and they found ..«==$¤@@@
##@¤$==«.. that feedback does not give rise to an ..«==$¤@##
##@¤$==«.. equilibrium. they were trying to prove ..«==$¤@##
¤¤==««««.. that nature is a tame beast. but she's ..««««==¤¤
#@@¤$==«.. not! ..«==$¤@@#
@¤¤¤$==«.. this may hold true out there... but ..«==$¤¤¤@
#¤==...... maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ......==¤#
##@¤$==«.. on your technique, you might easily ..«==$¤@##
##@¤$==«.. find recurrences. ..«==$¤@##
¤==....... .......==¤
¤$==«..... .....«==$¤
#¤===..... .....===¤#
#¤$=...... ......=$¤#
###¤$==«.. ..«==$¤###
##@¤$==«.. ..«==$¤@##