,,@,@,,@@, @@@,@,,@,,
,@@@@,@,@, ,,@@@,@@,,
@,,,@@@@@, ,@,,@@,@,,
@,,@,,,,@, @@,@,@@@,@
@,@@,,,@@, ,@@@@,,@@,
@@,@,,@,@@ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ @,,,@,@,@@
,@@@,@@@,, ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ @,,@@@@@,,
@,,@@,,@,@ ^, ,^ @,@,,,,@,,
@,@,@,@@@@ ^, feedback ,^ @@@,,,@@,@
@@@@@@,,,, ^, ,^ ,,@,,@,@@,
,,,,,@,,,@ ^,,,,,,,,,,,,^ ,@@,@@@,@@
,,,,@@,,@@ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ @,@@,,@@,@
,,,@,@,@,, @@,@,@,@@@
,,@@@@@@,, feedback is for making the process a ,@@@@@@,,@
,@,,,,,@,@ whole lot more messy, to introduce a @,,,,,@,@@
@@,,,,@@@@ fractal in the spice mix... things or @,,,,@@@,@
,@,,,@,,,@ populations of things start to be self @,,,@,,@@,
@@,,@@,,@@ referential or self eating @,,@@,@,@,
,@,@,@,@,@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... @,@,@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@, @@@@,,,,,@
,,,,,,,,@@ in the sixties they did research in the ,,,@,,,,@,
,,,,,,,@,, jungle and in the sea and they found ,,@@,,,@@,
,,,,,,@@,@ that feedback does not give rise to an ,@,@,,@,@,
,,,,,@,@@, equilibrium. they were trying to prove @@@@,@@@@,
,,,,@@@,@, that nature is a tame beast. but she's ,,,@@,,,@,
,,,@,,@@@@ not! ,,@,@,,@@,
,,@@,@,,,@ this may hold true out there... but ,@@@@,@,@,
,@,@@@,,@, maybe not in signal wizardry? depending @,,,@@@@@,
@@@,,@,@@@ on your technique, you might easily @,,@,,,,@,
,,@,@@@,,, find recurrences. @,@@,,,@@@
,@@@,,@,,, @@,@,,@,,@
@,,@,@@,,, ,@@@,@@,@@
@,@@@,@,,, @,,@@,@@,,
@@,,@@@,,, @,@,@@,@,@
,@,@,,@,,@ @@@@,@@@@,
@@@@,@@,@@ ,,,@@,,,@,