.....==§£@ @£§==.....
..==§££@## ##@££§==..
..==§££@@@ @@@££§==..
......=§£@ @£§=......
..==§££@@# #@@££§==..
..==§££@@# .............. #@@££§==..
..==§££@@# .............. #@@££§==..
...==§§££@ .. .. @££§§==...
..==§£@@## .. feedback .. ##@@£§==..
..==§£@@## .. .. ##@@£§==..
.....=§§£@ .............. @£§§=.....
..==§££@@@ .............. @@@££§==..
..==§£@@## ##@@£§==..
..==§££@@# feedback is for making the process a #@@££§==..
..==§££@@# whole lot more messy, to introduce a #@@££§==..
..==§££@## fractal in the spice mix... things or ##@££§==..
....==£££@ populations of things start to be self @£££==....
..==§££@## referential or self eating ##@££§==..
..==§££@@@ (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... @@@££§==..
.....==§§£ £§§==.....
......=££@ in the sixties they did research in the @££=......
....===£@@ jungle and in the sea and they found @@£===....
..=====££@ that feedback does not give rise to an @££=====..
..==§££@@# equilibrium. they were trying to prove #@@££§==..
....=§§£@@ that nature is a tame beast. but she's @@£§§=....
....==§£££ not! £££§==....
....=§££££ this may hold true out there... but ££££§=....
......==§£ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending £§==......
.....==£££ on your technique, you might easily £££==.....
......==£@ find recurrences. @£==......
..==§££@@# #@@££§==..
.....=§§£@ @£§§=.....
....==££@@ @@££==....
...==§§££@ @££§§==...
..==§££@@@ @@@££§==..
..==§££@@# #@@££§==..