..^=\§&&¶# #¶&&§\=^..
.^=\§&&¶## ##¶&&§\=^.
..^=\§&&¶# #¶&&§\=^..
...^=\§&&¶ ¶&&§\=^...
....^=\§&& &&§\=^....
.....^=\§& ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ &§\=^.....
....^=\§&& ^............^ &&§\=^....
...^=\§&&¶ ^. .^ ¶&&§\=^...
..^=\§&&¶# ^. feedback .^ #¶&&§\=^..
.^=\§&&¶## ^. .^ ##¶&&§\=^.
..^=\§&&¶# ^............^ #¶&&§\=^..
...^=\§&&¶ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ¶&&§\=^...
....^=\§&& &&§\=^....
.....^=\§& feedback is for making the process a &§\=^.....
....^=\§&& whole lot more messy, to introduce a &&§\=^....
...^=\§&&¶ fractal in the spice mix... things or ¶&&§\=^...
..^=\§&&¶# populations of things start to be self #¶&&§\=^..
.^=\§&&¶## referential or self eating ##¶&&§\=^.
..^=\§&&¶# (autovore...) or spiraling in or out... #¶&&§\=^..
...^=\§&&¶ ¶&&§\=^...
....^=\§&& in the sixties they did research in the &&§\=^....
.....^=\§& jungle and in the sea and they found &§\=^.....
....^=\§&& that feedback does not give rise to an &&§\=^....
...^=\§&&¶ equilibrium. they were trying to prove ¶&&§\=^...
..^=\§&&¶# that nature is a tame beast. but she's #¶&&§\=^..
.^=\§&&¶## not! ##¶&&§\=^.
..^=\§&&¶# this may hold true out there... but #¶&&§\=^..
...^=\§&&¶ maybe not in signal wizardry? depending ¶&&§\=^...
....^=\§&& on your technique, you might easily &&§\=^....
.....^=\§& find recurrences. &§\=^.....
....^=\§&& &&§\=^....
...^=\§&&¶ ¶&&§\=^...
..^=\§&&¶# #¶&&§\=^..
.^=\§&&¶## ##¶&&§\=^.
..^=\§&&¶# #¶&&§\=^..
...^=\§&&¶ ¶&&§\=^...